John worsdale astrology

In the 9th-century Baghdad was the intellectual center of the Islamic world and it was here that the astrological wisdom of the ages was studied in a favorable and vibrant intellectual setting that permitted the exchange of astrological ideas and the acquisition of more astrological knowledge. At this time the three most important sciences that formed part of the great European renaissance were astrology, astronomy and mathematics. The works of Ptolemy and the great Arab astrologers were translated into Greek and by the 13th-century the greatest human minds were absorbed in its study.

A Golden Age of astrology. By then the astronomical data needed to calculate a chart was more accurate and the astrological data had been systematically organized. Heredity, environment and education were all factored into the life equation but ultimately the birth time ruled and it was rarely accurate.

He was one of the top five doctors in the world and taught at the School of Medicine at the University of Bologna. In Luca Guarico published a book of celebrity horoscopes including popes, cardinals, princes, noblemen and artists. Astrology marched into the 17th-century with most astrologers going by the books written by Ptolemy and Hipparchus. From to William Lilly, considered one of the foremost astrologers who ever lived, published his famous almanac. Astrology under attack.

Astrology had always been strongly opposed by the Church, but its real enemies turned out to be the astronomers and when the French Academy of Science was founded in the 17th-century there was a ban placed on astrology. Then as new scientific laws that explained life and the universe were discovered there was no need for God or astrology and its mystical notions became hopelessly obsolete. Astrology and astronomy got divorced and science got obsessed with physical substance and material phenomena.

Forced into the shadows astrology was preserved by secret societies — the Freemasons, Rosicrucians and the lesser known Hermetic Orders. An astrology revival in Britain. Then, in Britain in the late 18th-century, astrologers like Ebenezer Sibly and John Worsdale did their best to dignify the art and traditional practice of astrology. Sibly embraced the new-astrology while Worsdale stayed with Ptolemy — the source of all authentic astrology. Then in — two years before the discovery of Neptune — Zadkiel founded the British Association for the Advancement of Astral and other Sciences.

Pisces and the Age of mystical astrology. When Pisces dawned astrology and astronomy were virtually one and the same and by the end they were separated and bitter enemies. Galileo Galilei, Tycho Brahe and Johannes Kepler were three astrologer-astronomers who made important discoveries about the nature of the universe. Astrology played an important role in medieval medicine and the diagnosis and cure of disease became an integral part of stellar healing at this time. During the Age of Pisces it was accepted that astrology explained the past, present and future, that you were created by the divine mind and that your life traveled a course set by your personal astrology.

They believed that the apparent purposelessness and chaos of life was governed by a glorious and intricate design in the sky. But Piscean Age astrology was mystical — not scientific — and while some astrologers did make some amazingly accurate predictions the charts they constructed and used were always wrong. In the 12th-century it pervaded European culture. In astrology was taught at Cambridge University. They were in fact one scientific discipline. Greece: The Platonic revolution The Hellenistic world: The zodiac Christianity: A star out of Jacob Rome: The imperial heaven I would hope so, too.

Astrology is seen as an integral part of religion, myth, philosophy and culture in general. This is an amusing premise, as there are virtually no actual astrologers, anywhere in history, who can be made to fit this format. Here is a sample, I have literally opened the book at random: The Greek philosophers were theorists. This does not mean that they were not practitioners.

You are here

They quite clearly were, and the development of their idea of the philosophical lifestyle, lived in harmony with the cosmos, was central to their work. They were also concerned as the Babylonian astrologers with abstract models, with what David Brown called the 'EAE paradigm', but they differed in that they were moving from models which depended on many gods, to one which required only a single creator.

In their own way, too, the Babylonians had to adjust to the Zoroastrianism of their Persian rulers, and the emerging Greek philosophical monotheism should be seen as a part of an international trend. However, the observational imperative was maintained. For some, astrology had to be based on empirical observation and seasonal cycles. We have just a few hints that the pragmatic, naturalistic astrology of Works and Days , Brown's 'PCP Paradigm' - the reliance on the empirical prediction of celestial phenomena and related events - was continuing.

In support of this he shows us shards of ancient bone with 28 notches illustration 2 , rehashes Stonehenge illustration 3 as an ancient observatory a fake theory, by the way , and by trying to trace some kind of written transmission from one ancient culture to another. This is the sort of work which pleases academics, like Mr. Campion himself. It also impresses laymen. I am neither. But it has nothing to do with astrology per se, as Robert Schmidt's work with Hindsight brilliantly proves.

Hellenistic astrology from this same period goes far, far beyond anything that can be developed by means of observation. As does Vedic astrology. And the question is, where did it come from, if not from observation? Answer: What do the following books have in common? Tetrabiblos , by Ptolemy: Written, c.

Unknown for more than a century. Unknown to Vettius Valens, a century later. Written, c. It was largely unknown before the 12th century.

  1. poosamuthu nadi astrology address.
  2. Navigation menu.
  3. toronto star february 28 2020 horoscope.
  4. Account Options.

What do these books, and many others from the same period, have in common? They were not written as manuals of instruction. They were not written for students. They, like Bach's Brandenburg Concerti, were written for the idle amusement of a lord or noble. Or at least, that was the authors' fervent hope. They ended up, unread and in Bach's case, unplayed , in libraries. Where they were discovered decades, even centuries, later. So if these early books, these masterpieces of the genre, were not intended as teaching manuals, were not, in fact, eagerly snatched up by aspiring students, then how, and with what, were early astrologers taught?

Can astrology predict death ?? accurately ?

Here's another set of "what do these have in common? But a song on a printed page is what, exactly? A lyric. What are lyrics? So what is Astronomica? Answer: A Latin didactic poem. So what do poems have that ordinary prose does not? What is meter?

Meter is a form of rhythm based on syllabic order. Only the first? See all four here. How many stanzas of Poe's The Raven? Now for the hard question: WHY do you know these verses? Why do you know them better than, say, Lincoln's Gettysburg Address? Many of us had to memorize and recite it in front of class. Why do you remember the song but not the Address? What can meter and rhythm do that ordinary prose cannot? Meter can be memorized and recited, word for word, years, even decades later.

How much can be memorized? The Iliad is a Greek epic poem, dating to the 9th century BC. Written in dactylic hexameter, it comprises 15, lines of verse. It is known to have been transmitted orally for centuries. The only reason we know the age of the poem is because we know the approximate date of the events it records, the Trojan War: Around the 12th century BC. So could astrology have been orally transmitted? It could have.

For how long? We do not know, but the Indian Vedas give hints of staggering age. Next question: Why oral transmission?

John Lennon Natal Chart: ASMR Astrology

Why not read a book? Answer: Books were written by hand. Which meant there were not very many of them. It also meant they were expensive. Students, then and now, are poor. Individual leaves were glued or stitched together to form long scrolls. Long term storage, or mere casual use would risk leaves separating from other leaves. Which would result in a book scroll, remember in fragments. Once in pieces, it would not necessarily be clear which piece went where. Individual pieces were easily damaged, and just as easily lost altogether. Early inks were subject to fading over time, and not just from exposure to sun and air.

This is quite apart from accidental loss due to rain or fire, or deliberate destruction, as with the sack of the library at Alexandria. Remember, before the printing press, there were very few copies of any book. Now think of oral transmission. I presume the author started with words on paper, an outline at least, and gradually found the meter, the rhythm, the poetry, to express his ideas.

Until finally he was finished and was happy, and began to recite it. He did not recite his poem for idle amusement. What did these books amount to, in actual practice? In actual practice, an astrologer would search through the verses until he came to one that described the situation as he understood it. He would then repeat it verbatim, orally. This is where proverbs come from: Fragments of a forgotten whole. I regret the following are not astrological. If anyone knows where I can find pithy astrological proverbs, in English, I would be grateful.

Absence makes the heart grow fonder. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. A stitch in time saves nine. One bad apple spoils the bunch. By such means, an astrologer could instruct his pupil. A father could teach his son. Word for word, perserved, intact, for centuries. Up to the fall of the Roman Empire, this was, in fact, how knowledge was transmitted, from generation to generation, century to century. This was why all notable Romans wrote in verse. They were hoping to achieve immortality by means of oral transmission.

I spent some time with the Introduction in G. Gould's translation of Manilius's Astronomica. In his Preface, Gould complains that Manilius is virtually untranslatable: Moreover, he frequently embarks on an audacious plan of rendering diagrams, tables, and maps in hexameter form; and in these places even the best of translations would need visual aids to be readily comprehensible.

But this gives the game away. Astronomica was intended to be memorized and recited. Tables in meter, however clumsy, could be recited and therefore remembered. Those in prose would be forgotten and lost. The author's challenge was to set his entire text not only in meter, but in the same meter, from first to last. The fate of Manilius's book was unlike that of Ptolemy's, or for that matter, Firmicus'.

At several places in his Introduction, Gould draws parallels between Manilius and Firmicus Maternus, at one point remarking that Firmicus "had Manilius open in front of him" as he wrote. Why did Firmicus favor Manilius, but not Ptolemy or Dorotheus?

Because Manilius was, by AD, in oral transmission. Firmicus did not "have a book open" in front of him. Firmicus was reciting Manilius from memory. Which also accounts for the variations in early written copies of Astronomica. Different people, when they came to set the book down in writing, had been reciting it differently.

Early Islam was a religion of the Book, in this case, the Koran. Islam quickly became a religion of scholars. These they carefully copied and preserved. They then added many new works of their own. These then became the basis of the first printed books. By the time of William Lilly 17th century , all memory of oral transmission had long been lost. By these means, I establish the existence of an astrological oral transmission.

I looked in Campion's index. I did not find oral transmission in it. And while it is true that oral transmission has long been forgotten, it's also true that it is a glaring omission.

Download | AstroRiznica

But this is merely an excuse. Textural analysis will prove that many early written books were transcriptions of oral books. Firmicus may well be Manilius embroidered - missing pieces of Manilius were actually found in Firmicus's text. I discovered it to have been written at least 50 years prior to its first publication, which was Many early printed books were in fact centuries old hand-me-downs, but that's another story for another time.

A book that strives to be definitive, as this book does, must have a proper foundation. For some people, first drafts are best. Continuum, pages, hardcover with dustjacket. Matthew: The Gospel to the Hebrews 2. Jerusalem's debt to the Persians 3. The Magi in history 4. Empire of the soul 5. Which star was it? The legacy of the Magi 8. The Magi's Messiah Chapter notes Bibliography Index Comment : As is well-known, Matthew's is the only Gospel that mentions the fabled Star of Bethlehem, for which there seems scant historical evidence. So what does Courtney think? Jupiter by itself?

It's as good an idea as anyone has come up with yet. In the process she easily demolishes the work of many other pretenders, such as the book by Michael Molnar, though without ever quite producing her own solution. I myself once proposed a solution, and with Courney's observation, and my own work on the Ages, I think I might now have a complete, sensible solution.

Which I will write as soon as I can find the time. New Page, pages. This is his animal - the ancient world 2. Glad hearts - the dark ages 3. Mark of a worm - the middle ages 4. The shephard's calendar 5. Going natural - the sixteenth century 6. Astrology's golden age 8. The ninteeth century revival No less an exact science - the Theosophists Hated virtues - Solar biology Alan Leo Evangeline Adams Popular astrology in the 's Cheiro Eary sun sign columns The 's boom in sun sign astrology The big fight - Naylor versus Barbanell Entering the Age of Aquarius - the 's